Jdownloader 2 firefox6/19/2023 making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc.exited 0. Since last night I have been unable to access the container's web gui. However, I could add in the readme a section explaining how to update it. Also, JDownloader being a self-contained/self-updating application, the container itself doesn't have the whole application, but just the core JAR. Since this package is in beta, I'm not sure that forcing all users to use it is a good idea. Note that there is no need to manually set ownership of the files. PPS: Maybe you d like to consider making this part of one of your container updates in the future PS: Settings / rar-Extractor now shows 7zip Binding Version: 15.09.2.01beta changed ownership of the 2 files to nobody:users (chown -cR nobody:users) changed rights of the 2 files to 666 (chmod 666) Downloaded the archive for linux from the first post of the related thread over at jdownloader forums and extracted it Here’s what I did for those who might also be interested in rar5 compatiblity: This container is for x86_64 architecture (64bit). You should just need to extract it your appdata folder (probably to /mnt/user/appdata/JDownloader2/libs/). You should be able to install yourself the beta package provided in the thread your mentioned. The files and thread I was referring to can be found here (sorry, could not find something similar as this thread is german) what is the container version? 64bit or 32bit? ARM v7, v8 or something different? or am i missing something and this is just an error with my version of the docker? would it be possible to implement a fix to the docker container in general so that unrar5 extraction could be supported? Dont know, if thats also a valid case for this docker. There seems to be a fix for the libs where some jar files need to be updated. I just have a few question as I keep on getting errors on extracting some rar files that I suggest to be in rar5 format and that the container refuses to unpack.Īlthough 7zip Binding version shows up as 4.65 which seems to be correct afaik I found a thread over at jdownloader forums stating that having trouble with rar5 is -or at least was- a common problem. Removal of any posts that are of poor quality, lazy, or confusing is entirely up to the moderators.Awesome work, so thanks for the container.Harassment of others, as well as insulting remarks & inappropriate behavior, will result in a permanent ban without warning.Quit spamming the same issues, contentious politics, & misinformation.Do a search on the internet or this subreddit ( Megathread & old posts) first, so as to not be repetitive.Don't be repetitious, spam, harass others, or submit low-quality posts Do not encourage rule breaking by asking which specific title another person is looking for when they make a request.Ĥ.No you may not link to a specific pirated title ( eg.Yes you can link to the top level domain of a site ( eg.No you may not ask for a specific pirated title (eg.Where can I find games, movies, softwares etc). Yes you can ask generalized questions (eg.Don't request or link to specific pirated titles No self-promotion of your own work is allowed unless you expressly receive permission from the moderators.ģ.No trading or selling content, especially not for monetary services.No asking for content downloads, activation keys etc.No pleading for invites to scene sites, private torrent trackers, DDL forums or other sites with closed registrations.Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote You are not allowed to post any visual representation for seeding / leeching ratio.Ģ. Images that are too blurry or have a lot of unintelligible text will be deleted. Comics, Memes & Screenshots are acceptable, but should be original and of good quality.The focus on file-sharing, articles and discussions about moral dilemmas with unauthorized distribution, legal developments, challenges, and other related topics are all welcome.Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |